Skip to content

How to email a potential PhD supervisor

By Ziad Maltiti · Updated 5 October 2026

A researcher in gloves placing sample tubes in a tray of ice in a laboratory

Many PhDs begin with an email to a researcher you would like to work with. A specific, well-judged message can start a conversation that ends in a place on their programme; a generic one is usually deleted within seconds. The email does not have to be long or clever, but it does have a particular job to do.

This matters most in systems where a supervisor effectively decides who joins their group, which is common in the UK, much of Europe and Australia, and for funded projects anywhere. In some American programmes you apply to the department first, but a short, well-aimed email to a faculty member can still help.

What the email is for

You are not asking for a decision. The aim is to open a conversation and show that you would be a serious student whose interests match theirs. Supervisors receive a lot of these messages, many of them obviously copied and pasted, so yours needs to show that it was written to this person about this work.

Finding the right people to write to

Start with a shortlist of five to ten researchers rather than one. These are the usual places to look:

Where to lookWhat you will findTip
University department pagesStaff lists, research groups, current PhD studentsCheck whether a page says the person is “accepting students” or lists open projects
Google Scholar and university repositoriesRecent papers and who they publish withSort by date; a researcher’s last three years matter more than their best-known paper
PhD listing sites such as FindAPhD, jobs.ac.uk and EURAXESSFunded projects with a named supervisor and a deadlineA listed project tells you the person has funding and wants a student
Reference lists of papers you admireThe people a field actually citesFollow the names that keep coming up

Read their work first

Handwritten notes and a highlighted printed paper on a desk
Half an hour with two or three recent papers gives you something specific to say.

Before writing, read some of the researcher’s recent papers. You do not need to know everything they have published, but you should understand what they concentrate on and how it relates to what you want to do. Note one question their work raises for you, or one way your own project would build on it. That single specific point is what separates a real enquiry from a mass mailing.

If you cannot say why you are writing to this researcher in particular, you are not ready to send the email yet.

What a good email looks like

Keep it to roughly 150 to 250 words. A busy academic is more likely to read a short, focused message to the end. Here is an example to adapt; the details and the researcher are invented.

  1. 1Subject line: say what this is and name the topic, so it is not mistaken for spam.
  2. 2Who you are: degree, institution and stage in one or two lines.
  3. 3Why them: one specific point from their work and how it connects to yours. This is the most important paragraph.
  4. 4One small request: whether they are taking students and whether they would talk. Not "please accept me".
  5. 5Attachments: a CV and, if relevant, a transcript. A one-page research outline is useful if the programme expects your own project.

Tone

Be respectful and professional without becoming stiff. Use the correct form of address, write plainly, and check your spelling, especially of their name.

Do

  • Use their correct title, such as Dr or Professor
  • Mention one paper or project by name
  • Send each email individually
  • Attach files as PDFs with clear names

Don't

  • Open with "Dear Sir/Madam" or "Respected Sir"
  • Paste in your whole CV or life story
  • Copy several professors on one email
  • Ask them to "check your eligibility" for you

If you do not hear back

No reply is common and rarely personal; academics are busy and emails get buried. A simple schedule keeps you moving without pestering anyone:

  1. Before you sendRead two or three recent papers and check the programme page for funding deadlines.
  2. Day 1Send the email.
  3. After about two weeksSend one short, polite follow-up in the same thread, asking whether they had a chance to see your message.
  4. After about four weeksIf there is still no reply, move on to the next person on your shortlist.

Writing to several well-chosen supervisors in turn is far more productive than waiting on one.

If they reply

A positive reply often leads to a short video call. Treat it as a conversation rather than an interview, but prepare. Be ready to explain your project idea in two minutes, and have a few questions of your own:

  • Is there funding for this project, or would I need to find a scholarship?
  • How does the group work day to day, and how often do students meet you?
  • What have your recent PhD students gone on to do?
  • Which application deadline should I aim for?

If they mention that funding depends on an external scholarship, our guides to finding a funded PhD and where PhD funding comes from cover the next step.